Giving credit where credit is due can be squirrelly business, but it’s important. I was first introduced to “Those Darn Squirrels” by Kirk Robbins (@science_4_all) at a training over five years ago. In a nutshell, the squirrels want an old man’s bird feeder and end up designing various ways to get around his defenses including a squirrel launcher. Kirk used the read-aloud as a way to model alternative ways to engage students in scientific thinking, engineering as problem solving, and the design process. I was instantly nuts about this book.
Give the Set Up
I found paperback copies on sale for $3 each at Amazon.com and then convinced my principal to order a copy for every teacher in the building. I was excited because I was going to run my first Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) professional development (PD) training for the building and I wanted to have a “door prize” for the staff since it was an optional workshop day. We covered a lot of material, but I wanted there to be some hands-on doing as well as some practical and applied follow-up application from the PD.
The Aha Moment
So I devised a lesson series that would take advantage of the “Those Darn Squirrels” book that each staff member received. The premise was a vehicle for introducing the new NGSS engineering standards. After introducing the standards and reading the book, teachers took the role of the squirrels and had to use a Ziploc bag full of everyday objects to design a squirrel launcher to help the squirrels (popsicle sticks, paper clips, rubber bands, etcetera, but any supplies from the staff supply room work). The constraints being that they could only use the materials in the bag and they only had so much time. The success criteria focused simply on the distance launched. I’ve rarely seen staff get so into an activity before. They designed feverishly and were very competitive while thoroughly enjoying themselves. The follow-up is what I’d like to talk about though, because we took this mini-lesson with the staff and mirrored it through a series of lessons in each 3rd-6th grade classroom across my school. The result was one of the most successful lesson series that I’ve ever taught.
Organize Based on the Three NGSS Engineering Standards
Standard 1: 3-5-ETS1-1: Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that includes specified criteria for success and constraints on materials, time, or cost.
Standard 2: 3-5-ETS1-2: Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
Standard 3: 3-5-ETS1-3: Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that can be improved.
Design Process: We looked at the NGSS Design process and talked about how we were going to work through one cycle of this. The focus was on practice and experience for later application. The more modalities engaged in learning then the more likely the learning is to stick. So I wanted everyone to hear, see, and do as much as possible. The NGSS engineering design cycle has three parts and each part relates to one of the three K-5 engineering standards. By making this connection, hopefully everyone was able to see the big picture and context for integration as well as application.
The basic lesson progression started with learning about NGSS engineering standards in general, but with a focus on constraints and criteria for success (3-5-ETS1-1). We then focused on applying the engineering design process. This included talking about failure as a key part of the design process and reframing failure through F.A.I.L. (First Attempt In Learning). Group work facilitated brainstorming, with group designs drafted before ever touching the materials. After teacher approval, students built the first prototype. Group launches with feedback from the other engineering teams were highly engaging. We lined up meter sticks to measure (in metric of course because we’re scientists), and “wow” did those squirrels travel far. The designs were as varied as the students. Between 14 classrooms almost no two designs were the same. Group discussion and debrief followed, with designing next steps if time allowed. Follow-up lessons also provide plenty of opportunity for more science: think simple machines, transfer/transformation of energy, effects of gravity, etc.
We Want More
Students begged their teachers for more and I had to double the amount of kits so that teachers could do follow-up lessons focused on the iteration portion of the design process. They all wanted a second and third chance at completing the design process and iteratively improving their prototypes. Students were driven, engaged, and motivated to improve.
Tie-ins to the Engineering Fellows Project
I applied for and was selected as an inaugural member of the Washington STEM (@washingtonstem) and Washington MESA (@WashingtonMESA) Engineering Fellowship Program (#EngineeringFellows) in partnership with the University of Washington. I submitted this project and mine was one of two projects chosen from the teacher applicants. My project idea was then chosen by most of the teachers and became one of the most popular projects within the group (I was actually a little flabbergasted but also excited). One teacher used this as a back-to-school family project for whole school and made 500 kits! Another teacher also used this as a community-building activity for her class. One teacher even used it as the first STEM project that she’d ever taught in her class. Wow! I am beyond thrilled and humbled by this. I am reinvigorated to revisit and improve the project after learning from their experiences. In fact, we’ll be starting year 2 of this lesson series very soon in the 4th grade classes at my school. We’re going to try doubling up classes so we’ll have 50 future engineers launching tiny squirrels across the room at the same time. In other words, this story is to be continued very soon…
Links & Resources
My Previous Blog Post on Making: http://corelaboratewa.org/a-movement-in-the-making/
Link to Those Darn Squirrels: https://www.amazon.com/Those-Darn-Squirrels-Adam-Rubin/dp/0547576811
Link to Kirk Robbin’s Website: https://teachscience4all.org/
Link to Kirk’s “Those Darn Squirrels” lesson that I learned about only after designing mine (whoops!): https://teachscience4all.org/ngss-resources/
Pictures on Martin Sortun Website: https://teacher.kent.k12.wa.us/manage/page/mod/AlbumSet/viewAlbum?id=11831
Washington STEM Engineering Fellows Link: http://www.washingtonstem.org/Our-Approach/STEM-Innovation/engineering/engineering-fellows#.V-bnVPArLic
Washington MESA Engineering Fellows Link: http://washingtonmesa.org/blog/2016/3/2/engineering-fellows
Engineering Disciplinary Core Ideas from Next Generation Science Standards: http://www.nextgenscience.org/dci-arrangement/3-5-ets1-engineering-design
NGSS Engineering at the National Science Teachers Association: http://ngss.nsta.org/DisplayStandard.aspx?view=topic&id=23
Teach Engineering K12 Curriculum: https://www.teachengineering.org/
Instructables website merges engineering with inexpensive craft projects: http://www.instructables.com/
Maker Ed Organization: http://makered.org/
Latest posts by Douglas Ferguson (see all)
- No More Death Stars… and Other Engineering Standards - November 8, 2017
- Renewable Energy Leadership - October 11, 2017
- Engineering Future Engineers - September 13, 2017