Statistics

Occupational Injury Statistics in 2026

2024 BLS workplace injury, illness, and fatality data by industry, size, and severity.

Occupational Injury Statistics in 2024: the numbers behind risk, severity, and where incidents concentrate

Occupational injury statistics in 2024 show a labor market where nonfatal injuries are still common, serious, and unevenly distributed across industries. The dataset also shows that fatal workplace harm remains concentrated in a small number of high-risk occupations and event types (BLS sources throughout).

Table of contents

Key takeaways

  • Private industry employers reported 2.5 million nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses in 2024 (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).
  • The private-industry total recordable case rate was 2.3 per 100 full-time workers in 2024 (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).
  • Across all industries, including state and local government, there were 3,148,000 total recordable cases in 2024 (BLS Table 2: Numbers of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2024).
  • Healthcare and social assistance recorded 553.8 thousand injury and illness cases in private industry, the largest count among the listed sectors (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Transportation and warehousing posted the highest injury case rate at 4.4 per 100 full-time workers among the industries listed in the dataset (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • The United States recorded 5,070 fatal work injuries in 2024 (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).
  • A worker died every 104 minutes from a work-related injury in 2024 (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).

At a glance

Metric2024 figureSource
Private industry nonfatal injuries and illnesses2.5 millionBLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024
Private industry total recordable case rate2.3 per 100 full-time workersBLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024
Private industry days away from work cases888,100BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024
Private industry job transfer or restriction cases567,500BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024
Private industry other recordable cases1,032,800BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024
All-industry total recordable cases3,148,000BLS Table 2: Numbers of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2024
U.S. fatal work injuries5,070BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024
Fatal work injury rate3.3 per 100,000 full-time equivalent workersBLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024

A few of these numbers are especially useful because they set the frame for the rest of the article. The total case rate gives the broad picture, while the breakdown into days away from work, job restriction, and other recordable cases shows how serious many of these events are in day-to-day operations (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).

Nonfatal occupational injury statistics by the numbers

The headline measure in the dataset is the 2.5 million nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses reported by private industry employers in 2024 (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024). That figure matters because it captures the scale of workplace harm before you even start looking at severity or sector differences.

The private-industry breakdown shows three large buckets:

  • 888,100 cases involving days away from work (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).
  • 567,500 cases involving days of job transfer or restriction (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).
  • 1,032,800 other recordable cases (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).

That mix suggests a broad range of outcomes rather than one single type of incident driving the totals. Days-away cases are especially important because they indicate injuries or illnesses serious enough to interrupt regular work. Job transfer or restriction cases also point to meaningful operational disruption, even when an employee remains on the job (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).

Fast facts on private industry

  • 2.3 total recordable cases per 100 full-time workers (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).
  • 1.4 cases per 100 full-time workers involving days away from work, job restriction, or transfer (BLS Table 1: Incidence rates of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2024).
  • 0.8 cases per 100 full-time workers involving days away from work (BLS Table 1: Incidence rates of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2024).
  • 0.5 other recordable cases per 100 full-time workers (BLS Table 1: Incidence rates of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2024).
  • 1.0 illness cases per 100 full-time workers (BLS Table 1: Incidence rates of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2024).

Big number: The private sector alone accounted for 2.5 million nonfatal injuries and illnesses in 2024 (BLS Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 2024).

Which industries carried the heaviest burden

The industry counts make it clear that raw totals and per-worker rates do not tell the same story. Large workforces tend to produce large case counts, but the risk profile changes when you compare rates instead of totals.

IndustryNonfatal injury and illness casesInjury case rate per 100 full-time workersSource
Health care and social assistance553.8 thousand3.4BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Retail trade339.8 thousand3.0BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Manufacturing332.6 thousand2.7BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Transportation and warehousing261.5 thousand4.4BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Accommodation and food services234.8 thousand2.6BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Construction167.1 thousand2.2BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Wholesale trade126.8 thousand2.2BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services97.5 thousand1.8BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Professional, scientific, and technical services71.6 thousand0.7BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries
Other services except public administration63.9 thousand1.9BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries

Health care and social assistance stands out for scale, with 553.8 thousand cases in 2024 (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries). Retail trade and manufacturing also show very large counts, both above 300 thousand cases (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).

But the most notable risk rate in this group is transportation and warehousing. Its 4.4 per 100 full-time workers is higher than every other industry listed in the injury table (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries). That is a useful reminder that the biggest headcount industries are not always the most hazardous on a per-worker basis.

Industries with the highest injury rates in the dataset

  • Transportation and warehousing: 4.4 per 100 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting: 3.9 (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Arts, entertainment, and recreation: 3.9 (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Health care and social assistance: 3.4 (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Retail trade: 3.0 (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Manufacturing: 2.7 (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Accommodation and food services: 2.6 (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).

The spread from 0.3 in finance and insurance to 4.4 in transportation and warehousing is wide enough to matter operationally (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries). That gap shows why risk management has to be industry-specific rather than generic.

Lower-rate service sectors still record meaningful counts

Some sectors have low incidence rates but still register nontrivial totals because of workforce size.

  • Finance and insurance recorded 19.8 thousand cases at 0.3 per 100 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Information recorded 18.0 thousand cases at 0.7 per 100 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Professional, scientific, and technical services recorded 71.6 thousand cases at 0.7 per 100 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Management of companies and enterprises recorded 14.2 thousand cases at 0.5 per 100 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).

These figures are a useful reminder that even comparatively low-rate industries still need prevention systems, reporting discipline, and follow-through. Low rate is not the same thing as no burden.

Illness versus injury patterns

The dataset separates injuries from illnesses in a way that makes the occupational health picture more precise.

In private industry, the largest illness burden is concentrated in a few sectors:

  • Health care and social assistance recorded 62.6 thousand illness cases with an illness rate of 38.7 per 10,000 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries).
  • Manufacturing recorded 26.1 thousand illness cases with an illness rate of 20.9 per 10,000 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries).
  • Transportation and warehousing recorded 9.2 thousand illness cases with an illness rate of 15.4 per 10,000 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries).
  • Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting recorded 2.1 thousand illness cases with an illness rate of 22.0 per 10,000 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries).

The illness rates tell a slightly different story than the injury rates. Health care and social assistance dominates both the count and the rate, while agriculture shows a comparatively small count but a notable illness rate of 22.0 per 10,000 full-time workers (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries).

Illness rate comparison table

IndustryIllness casesIllness rateSource
Health care and social assistance62.6 thousand38.7 per 10,000 full-time workersBLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting2.1 thousand22.0 per 10,000 full-time workersBLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries
Manufacturing26.1 thousand20.9 per 10,000 full-time workersBLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries
Arts, entertainment, and recreation2.8 thousand18.8 per 10,000 full-time workersBLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries
Utilities0.9 thousand16.1 per 10,000 full-time workersBLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries
Transportation and warehousing9.2 thousand15.4 per 10,000 full-time workersBLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries

The illness table shows an important pattern: sectors with highly physical or exposure-intensive work can have rates that are high even when the case count is modest. That is especially visible in agriculture, utilities, and arts, entertainment, and recreation (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries).

Establishment size benchmarks

The establishment-size data gives a different view of exposure. Instead of comparing sectors, it compares the size of workplaces.

Establishment sizeTotal recordable case rate in 2023Source
1-10 employees1.0 per 100 full-time workersBLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size
11-49 employees2.1 per 100 full-time workersBLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size
50-249 employees3.1 per 100 full-time workersBLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size
250-999 employees2.8 per 100 full-time workersBLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size
1,000 or more employees2.7 per 100 full-time workersBLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size
Overall private-industry establishment-size rate2.4 per 100 full-time workersBLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size

Two details stand out in this comparison.

First, the 50-249 employee group had the highest rate at 3.1 (BLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size). That suggests mid-sized establishments may face a distinct operational challenge: enough scale to generate exposure, but not necessarily the same level of formalized controls found in larger enterprises.

Second, the smallest group, 1-10 employees, had the lowest rate at 1.0 (BLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size). That does not automatically mean smaller firms are safer in every sense; it only means the reported recordable case rate in this dataset is lower.

Why size matters in practice

  • Larger establishments may have more formal reporting systems, which can affect measurement.
  • Mid-sized employers can combine meaningful exposure with less redundancy in staffing and supervision.
  • The overall private-industry benchmark of 2.4 per 100 full-time workers provides a reference point for those comparisons (BLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size).

Fatal occupational injury statistics in 2024

The fatality data keeps the nonfatal numbers in perspective.

The United States recorded 5,070 fatal work injuries in 2024, with a fatal work injury rate of 3.3 fatalities per 100,000 full-time equivalent workers (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024). That means occupational safety is not just about reducing absenteeism or lost time. It is also about preventing the most severe outcomes.

A few fatality figures are especially important:

  • A worker died every 104 minutes from a work-related injury in 2024 (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).
  • Fatal falls, slips, and trips totaled 844 deaths (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).
  • Fatalities due to violent acts totaled 733 (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).
  • Of those violent-act fatalities, 470 were homicides and 263 were suicides (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).

Occupational groups with the largest fatal counts

  • Construction and extraction workers experienced 1,032 fatal work injuries in 2024 (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).
  • Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance workers experienced 356 fatal work injuries (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).
  • Protective service occupations experienced 281 fatal work injuries (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).
  • Fatal falls, slips, and trips among construction and extraction workers totaled 370 (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).

The construction and extraction figure is notable because it combines a high overall fatal count with a large share of fall-related deaths. That pairing makes fall prevention a central issue in the sector, not a side concern (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).

What the data suggests about workplace risk

The most useful way to read these occupational injury statistics is to treat them as a map rather than a scoreboard.

  • Counts identify where the burden is largest. Healthcare and social assistance, retail trade, and manufacturing all carry large case totals because they employ many workers and generate many recordable events (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Rates identify where work is most hazardous on a per-worker basis. Transportation and warehousing, agriculture, and arts, entertainment, and recreation stand out in the injury-rate data (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work injuries in private industries).
  • Illness rates highlight exposure-heavy workplaces. Health care and social assistance is the clearest example, with the largest illness count and the highest illness rate listed in the dataset (BLS Number and rate of nonfatal work illnesses in private industries).
  • Establishment size changes the lens. The highest total recordable case rate appears in the 50-249 employee category rather than the largest firms or the smallest firms (BLS Nonfatal occupational injury and illness rates by establishment size).
  • Fatality data remains concentrated in a few event types and occupations. Falls, violent acts, and construction-related work remain prominent in the 2024 fatality summary (BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary, 2024).

If you are using occupational injury statistics for planning, benchmarking, or SEO research, the most defensible interpretation is simple: workplace risk is uneven, sector-specific, and shaped by both exposure and scale. The numbers in this dataset support that view without needing any extra assumptions (BLS sources throughout).

Written by

corelaboratewa.org Editorial Team

Editorial team

corelaboratewa.org publishes practical how-to guides and educational articles with clear steps and useful context.